An Ethical Analysis Of The Disclosure Of Surgeons' Performance Data To Patients Within The Informed Consent Process
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$148,937.00
Summary
For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information co ....For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information contained in report cards when deciding whether or not to consent to have a particular surgeon conduct an operation on them. Contemporary bioethicists stress the importance of a proper informed consent process in medicine. This is a process in which a doctor advises a patient of relevant information and ensures that the patient comprehends that information, before the patient consents to an operation. Currently report cards in America are publicly disseminated on the internet, however there is no systematic attempt to incorporate the information contained in report cards into the informed consent process. We do not know if patients understand the information they are given, or if they incorporate it into their decision making procedures appropriately. In our study we will consider how information that is contained in report cards could best be used in the informed consent process. We will keep in mind the importance of helping patients to make their own informed decisions to consent to operations, the importance of respecting the professional integrity of surgeons and the importance of providing the best possible standard of care for patients. The result of our study will be a revised model of the informed consent process that incorporates report cards in an ethically acceptable way.Read moreRead less
Difficult Decisions: A Critical Analysis Of Consent To High-risk Medical Procedures
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$320,918.00
Summary
Consent is the cornerstone of ethics as applied to healthcare and is central to the relationship between healthcare and the law. Whilst no-one would deny the importance of seeking consent to high-risk medical procedures, much depends on the practical manner in which this is done. By studying consent for high-risk procedures with the participation of patients and their health care providers, we will both test the limits of consent and find practical ways to address those limits. In doing so, the ....Consent is the cornerstone of ethics as applied to healthcare and is central to the relationship between healthcare and the law. Whilst no-one would deny the importance of seeking consent to high-risk medical procedures, much depends on the practical manner in which this is done. By studying consent for high-risk procedures with the participation of patients and their health care providers, we will both test the limits of consent and find practical ways to address those limits. In doing so, the project will re-cast consent processes in a way that better accommodates the contingencies of clinical practice in high-risk settings in which patient autonomy is often compromised. Because this reformulation of consent will be grounded in the realities of high-risk clinical practice, our findings will reflect the needs and values of relevant stakeholders (patient and health professionals) and more likely to make a significant contribution to patient care and health policy. This project also addresses what the High Court of Australia has acknowledged as widespread weaknesses in the common formulation of consent in medicine. Finally this project, which operates in an important area of overlap between the law and medicine, will show how these disciplines can work jointly to serve the interests of all Australians, and Australian society.Read moreRead less
Ethical And Legal Issues Surrounding The Decision-making Process For Donating And Banking Umbilical Cord Blood
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$417,550.00
Summary
Altruistic donation of umbilical cord blood (UCB) is essential to provide a source of stem cells to treat various cancers and blood-immune disorders. However, parents can instead, bank UCB for personal use. This project will determine if parents are aware and understand differences between UCB donation and banking, as well as analysing the legal issues surrounding both processes. We aim to make recommendations to improve the decision-making process with the hope of increasing UCB donation rates.
Competence To Give Informed Consent For Research Participation In Schizophrenia And Related Psychoses.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$300,000.00
Summary
There is current controversy surrounding the ethics of allowing people with mental illness to participate in research. By trying to safe guard what is considered a vulnerable group, we may also be denying these people their rights to make decisions for themselves. The potential benefits of clinical research in an area where treatments are often ineffective and cause serious side effects may also be denied to these people. This study aims to measure the capacities of patients with psychoses to gi ....There is current controversy surrounding the ethics of allowing people with mental illness to participate in research. By trying to safe guard what is considered a vulnerable group, we may also be denying these people their rights to make decisions for themselves. The potential benefits of clinical research in an area where treatments are often ineffective and cause serious side effects may also be denied to these people. This study aims to measure the capacities of patients with psychoses to give informed consent to participate in clinical research. The uniqueness of this project is that subjects will be rated as either competent or incompetent according to legal definitions applicable in Australia by utilising predetermined thresholds. We will also determine whether performance of patients in tests of competence can be improved through an established educational program. Additionally we plan to re-evaluate patients after a period of 6 months in order to test the reliability of competence performance.Read moreRead less
Computer-assisted Clinical Guidelines For The Management Of Manifestations Of Anxiety, Aggression And Depression
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$354,032.00
Summary
This project focuses on creating a new approach to integration of clinical guidelines and the development of a computer-assisted tool to support medical reasoning in psychogeriatrics. The primary focus of this research is on helping medical practitioners to better manage dementia patients with symptoms of anxiety, aggression and depression living in nursing homes. It has the potential to fundamentally improve the way guidelines are utilised in clinical practice
Improving The Care For People With Acute Low Back Pain By Allied Health Professionals: Cluster RCT.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$682,134.00
Summary
The project focuses on the NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the management of acute low back pain, and more specifically the key messages of non-referral to x-ray and advising patients to stay active. A mixed design approach will be used in line with the framework for evaluating complex interventions (MRC 2000). A qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists, chiropractors and the patients of both will be conducted to identify the barriers and enablers ....The project focuses on the NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the management of acute low back pain, and more specifically the key messages of non-referral to x-ray and advising patients to stay active. A mixed design approach will be used in line with the framework for evaluating complex interventions (MRC 2000). A qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists, chiropractors and the patients of both will be conducted to identify the barriers and enablers to implementation of the evidence-based clinical practice guideline. The interviews will be underpinned by a theoretical framework grounded in behavioural theory. Information from the interviews will be used to develop a survey to canvas views of a larger population of chiropractors and physiotherapists. The results of the interviews and survey will inform the development of a targeted implementation strategy suitable for use in private physiotherapy and chiropractic clinics. Potential interventions include educational strategies, patient and practitioner information via various media, reminder systems and peer leadership. A cluster randomised controlled trial (C-RCT) will then be conducted to determine the effects of the strategy. Practices will be randomised to receive either the developed implementation strategy, including strategies targeted at clinicians and patients, or to a control group receiving access to the guideline alone. The outcomes of the implementation strategy will be assessed at the level of the practitioner (did the strategy result in a change of practice?), and the patient (did the practice change result in improved patient outcomes?). Subgroup analyses will investigate effects specific to chiropractors and physiotherapists.Read moreRead less
People who have experienced a previous heart attack or stroke are at greatest risk of having another cardiovascular event. Drug treatment, with aspirin and medication to lower blood pressure and cholesterol, has been shown to substantially reduce this risk. Despite good evidence that these drugs are effective, and that their use is recommended in both Australian and international guidelines, many people who should be taking these medications on a long-term basis are not. This may partly be due t ....People who have experienced a previous heart attack or stroke are at greatest risk of having another cardiovascular event. Drug treatment, with aspirin and medication to lower blood pressure and cholesterol, has been shown to substantially reduce this risk. Despite good evidence that these drugs are effective, and that their use is recommended in both Australian and international guidelines, many people who should be taking these medications on a long-term basis are not. This may partly be due to under-prescribing by doctors, but it is also likely that asymptomatic patients are discouraged by the cost and inconvenience of taking many tablets. In the first study of its kind in this country, we will determine whether a strategy based on the provision of recommended treatments in a single pill (a polypill) will result in better use of these drugs, and as a consequence, will achieve optimum practice in patients with heart disease or stroke. Under the care of their general practitioner, 1000 such patients will be randomly allocated to the polypill, or to continuing their usual treatment. At the end of 2 years, both groups will be assessed for the proportion of people still prescribed and taking all recommended treatments. We will also collect information on the attitudes and experiences of those participating in the study of prescribing (by doctors), dispensing (by pharmacists) and taking (by patients) the polypill. As cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of illness and death in Australia, finding new ways to ensure the maximum use of known, effective preventive treatments in patients with heart disease and stroke, particularly to those who have less access to health care, is of critical importance. The polypill represents a novel strategy with the potential to achieve this objective, and to improve the clinical care and well-being of many thousands of Australians.Read moreRead less