A Randomised, Double Blinded Intervention Study To Assess Health Effects Of Drinking Water From Rainwater Tanks
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$860,510.00
Summary
We are planning to perform a study in Adelaide to assess if drinking untreated rainwater causes a health risk. Eight years into a drought Australia's water sources are becoming increasingly depleted, so we need to reduce water consumption and consider using alternative sources of water. Increased use of rainwater is one of a number of solutions available. However, current recommendations state that rainwater can be safely used for purposes other than drinking, but because of potential contaminat ....We are planning to perform a study in Adelaide to assess if drinking untreated rainwater causes a health risk. Eight years into a drought Australia's water sources are becoming increasingly depleted, so we need to reduce water consumption and consider using alternative sources of water. Increased use of rainwater is one of a number of solutions available. However, current recommendations state that rainwater can be safely used for purposes other than drinking, but because of potential contamination and limited evidence regarding safety, drinking untreated rainwater is not approved by state health departments. The main outcome of this study will be to determine whether drinking untreated water from rainwater tanks poses a significant health risk. Additionally, we will determine if specific tank or maintenance characteristics can be identified that increase illness risk. The study design consists of following the health of 300 families who drink unboiled rainwater. Families will have a special tap installed that draws water through a water treatment unit (WTU). Half the families will have a working WTU and half will have a sham unit identical in appearance. The functional units sterilise water to remove any microorganisms present, while the sham filters have no effect. All participating families will keep a health diary for one year to record how often they suffer gastroenteritis. Neither the families nor the research workers will know which type of filter has been fitted. Water samples will be collected from selected households. At the end of a year the number of illnesses in the two groups will be compared. If those drinking rainwater from a sham filter suffer more often, then rainwater would be implicated as a source of gastroenteritis. This study will provide health authorities with a better understanding of the relationship between rainwater consumption and human health, and will provide data regarding safe uses of this alternative water source.Read moreRead less
Medicine-associated Dementia And Cognitive Impairment: Identifying The Problem, Reducing The Harm
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$513,116.00
Summary
Several studies have shown an association between use of anticholinergic or sedative medicines and increased risk of dementia. Questions remain about whether these medicines cause dementia (or are just used by people already at risk), whether or not cognitive function improves if the medicines are stopped or if the dose is reduced, and the characteristics of patients most likely to use these medicines. This program of research aims to answer these questions.
Diet As A Therapeutic Target In Depression: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$498,564.00
Summary
Depression is predicted to become the second-most common cause of disability in the world by 2020. While there is now compelling new evidence to suggest that diet plays an important role in the risk for and the genesis of depression, there are no existing data regarding the impact of dietary improvement on existing depressive illness. The aim of the proposed study is to answer the critically important and frequently asked question "If I improve my diet, will my mental health improve?"
Measuring Adverse Events: Development Of A Patient-Centred Adverse Event Reporting Tool (PAET)
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$454,721.00
Summary
The decision to treat a patient depends on knowing whether the treatment does more good than harm. If it is likely that the treatment will work as well as or better than other treatments and will have minimal associated risks, then that treatment would be recommended unless unavailable or prohibited by cost. Given two equally effective treatments the one with fewer side effects and greater tolerability would be preferred by all. In the process of acquiring knowledge on treatment benefit and trea ....The decision to treat a patient depends on knowing whether the treatment does more good than harm. If it is likely that the treatment will work as well as or better than other treatments and will have minimal associated risks, then that treatment would be recommended unless unavailable or prohibited by cost. Given two equally effective treatments the one with fewer side effects and greater tolerability would be preferred by all. In the process of acquiring knowledge on treatment benefit and treatment harm we rely on evidence from clinical trials. However, the evaluation of benefit versus harm is not symmetric in this setting. Much more effort (e.g. study design, study power, standardisation of efficacy outcome measures) goes into the assessment of whether a treatment works and rather than its potential harm, as measured by adverse events. Adverse event ascertainment and reporting is poorly standardised . There is no standardised measurement process that elicits adverse event information. There is no standardised method for quantifying adverse event information into an index or profile scores equivalent to instruments developed to measure health status, quality of life and other benefits of treatment. Developing astandardised Patient-centred Adverse Event Questionnaire will benefit multiple stakeholders. For Patients: An easy to understand summary measure of treatment harm aids patient understanding of the benefit versus risk. For Doctors, allied health professionals: The Questionnaire includes drug profiles, to align a drug profile with an individual patient's clinical profile. This leads to better patient care. In health policy: All of the above has flow-on effects for policy. Better adverse event data will facilitate information and understanding generally of risks of treatments, risk-benefits of treatments, and cost-effectiveness of management strategies.Read moreRead less
Pathophysiology And Alternative Preventative Strategy For Breast Cancer Chemotherapy-induced Bone Loss
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$540,356.00
Summary
Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy is the current optimal approach for treating breast cancer in premenopausal women. However, long-term skeletal defects (osteoporosis and fractures) caused by the chemotherapy have become an increasingly serious problem due to its intensified use and improved patient survival rate. This project seeks to elucidate the mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced bone defects and to initiate development of a preventative treatment using natural bioactive micronutrients.
Redefining body image for young women: Development of an Australian bibliotherapy program for adolescent girls. Body image dissatisfaction poses a serious health risk for adolescent girls and young women. Whilst this construct is highly prevalent amongst female populations, there are some who remain immune to the pervasiveness and subsequent development of these self-negating attitudes. However, little is known about the resilience processes utilised by those who are immune. This study aims to ....Redefining body image for young women: Development of an Australian bibliotherapy program for adolescent girls. Body image dissatisfaction poses a serious health risk for adolescent girls and young women. Whilst this construct is highly prevalent amongst female populations, there are some who remain immune to the pervasiveness and subsequent development of these self-negating attitudes. However, little is known about the resilience processes utilised by those who are immune. This study aims to develop an understanding of these resilience processes and utilise them in the construction and delivery of an innovative preventative program for adolescent girls. The outcomes of this research will provide young girls with an alternative voice, de-emphasising the objectification of self as a component of female identity formation and stem ongoing development of associated psychosocial risks.Read moreRead less
A Telehealth Mediated Nursing Intervention (PRISMS) To Enable Patient Monitoring And Self-care In Haematological Cancer Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$936,632.00
Summary
People with cancer are required to monitor and to initiate self care activities to manage side effects at home. In haematological cancer patients these side effects are often severe and life-threatening. Safe home care requires close communication with the health team. We will test if a mobile phone based system can: support patients to monitor their side effects; promote the delivery of evidence based self care advice in a timely manner; and mediate the role of nurses to effectively provide rea ....People with cancer are required to monitor and to initiate self care activities to manage side effects at home. In haematological cancer patients these side effects are often severe and life-threatening. Safe home care requires close communication with the health team. We will test if a mobile phone based system can: support patients to monitor their side effects; promote the delivery of evidence based self care advice in a timely manner; and mediate the role of nurses to effectively provide real-time patient support.Read moreRead less