Evaluation Of Aspirin And Tranexamic Acid In Coronary Artery Surgery: The ATACAS Trial
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,185,000.00
Summary
This large study will compare two types of drug treatment in 4600 patients undergoing heart surgery, to see whether either can reduce the risk of death or major complications. The complications after surgery we are measuring include heart attack, stroke, lung embolism, bleeding around the heart, breathing failure, kidney failure, major haemorrhage, serious wound infection, and death. The first drug being tested is low-dose aspirin. It is believed that aspirin can reduce the risk of a further hea ....This large study will compare two types of drug treatment in 4600 patients undergoing heart surgery, to see whether either can reduce the risk of death or major complications. The complications after surgery we are measuring include heart attack, stroke, lung embolism, bleeding around the heart, breathing failure, kidney failure, major haemorrhage, serious wound infection, and death. The first drug being tested is low-dose aspirin. It is believed that aspirin can reduce the risk of a further heart attack or stroke in patients with pre-existing heart disease. There is some evidence that aspirin may have similar effects in people undergoing heart surgery, but such use is constrained by a concern that there may be an increased risk of bleeding after surgery. For this reason, most patients having heart surgery are advised to stop their aspirin about one week before surgery. But patients could be missing out on aspirin's beneficial effects. At present, we do not know whether the benefits of aspirin could outweigh the risk of excesive bleeding. The second drug being tested is tranexamic acid. This drug prevents blood clot being broken down at the stitching sites of surgery, and probably reduces the amount of blood loss during and after heart surgery. It is known that use of this drug reduces the need for a blood transfusion. It is possible that this could avoid other more serious complications after surgery. Both of these drugs are being tested individually, but in addition we are testing whether they may have an extra beneficial effect when used together. The study is being done by a partnership of anaesthetitsts and surgeons at more than 20 hospitals around Australia.Read moreRead less
Improving The Surgical Outcomes For Barretts-derived Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma Through Early Detection.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$796,144.00
Summary
Some people with severe reflux develop Barrett's oesophagus, which puts them at high risk of developing cancer. Patients with Barrett's can be monitored by regular endoscopy to detect cancer early enough so that they can be treated successfully with surgery. The aim of this work is to identify patients who are at highest risk of cancer using molecular biomarkers. We will then determine the cost effectiveness of using biomarkers for surveillance of patients with Barrett's oesophagus.
The Quality Of Surgical Care Project: Quality Assurance, Clinical Audit And Outcomes Evaluation In Western Australia
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$346,018.00
Summary
The Quality of Surgical Care Project (QSCP) is a unique quality assurance program in Australia which promotes best practice in surgical and procedural care. The objectives of the QSCP are to evaluate the outcomes of surgical procedures in Western Australia (WA) and to compare them with international standards. The QSCP was established in 1996, as a collaborative venture among the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), the Department of Public Health, (UWA) and the Health Department of WA ....The Quality of Surgical Care Project (QSCP) is a unique quality assurance program in Australia which promotes best practice in surgical and procedural care. The objectives of the QSCP are to evaluate the outcomes of surgical procedures in Western Australia (WA) and to compare them with international standards. The QSCP was established in 1996, as a collaborative venture among the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), the Department of Public Health, (UWA) and the Health Department of WA. The QSCP is only possible because of the unique population-based record linkage available in this state and is consistent with priorities identified in the National Health Information Development Plan in the areas of record linkage and health outcomes, as well as with the monitoring of interventions recommended by the Taskforce on Quality in Australian Health Care. The surgical procedures reviewed are selected to include a broad range of surgical specialties on the basis of national priority, in consultation with the RACS and with input from the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S). This application proposes to continue the core program in promoting best practice in procedural care by reviewing selected procedures including the outcomes of laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures, and endoluminal stenting surgery due to their rapid proliferation during the 1990's. This second stage of the QSCP proposes the introduction of two new quality assurance themes. Firstly, to promote the clinical safety and post-implementation surveillance of new surgical interventions and other medical technology by establishing the WA Registry and Surgical Audit of New Surgical Interventions. Secondly, to comprehensively and independently audit all surgical mortality at a population level. A dissemination strategy will be established to 'complete the loop' in the evaluation and audit processes.Read moreRead less