Development And Evaluation Of A Decision Aid For Women With A Breech-presenting Baby.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$156,890.00
Summary
Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women with a breech presenting baby ( ....Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women with a breech presenting baby (bottom rather than head first) in late pregnancy. A decision aid for breech presentation is timely because recent results of an international trial have dramatically altered women's options in the management of breech presentation. The trial of vaginal breech birth versus planned caesarean section (CS) found overwhelming evidence of reduced infant death and disability for women with a planned CS. Planned CS is now considered best practice for delivery of a breech presentation at birth. However, another treatment option for women with a breech presentation is turning the breech to head first before birth (called external cephalic version, ECV). Each of these options (ECV or planned CS) has benefits and risks, and the relative importance of these benefits and risks varies for individual women, a scenario where a decision aid produces the greatest benefit. The breech decision aid developed in this project will be based on the best and most recently available evidence and outcomes. It will incorporate a workbook, audiotape-CD and worksheet that will guide (but not direct) women to a treatment option that best suits them, taking ~20 minutes to complete. The decision aid will be evaluated to assess the impact on women's satisfaction with decision making, knowledge, anxiety and pregnancy outcomes. If successful, the results could be applied to improve consumer information and participation in clinical decisions across a wide spectrum of pregnancy care issues.Read moreRead less
A Randomised Controlled Trial Of A Decision Aid For The Management Of Pain In Labour And Childbirth
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$267,375.00
Summary
Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women regarding the management of pai ....Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women regarding the management of pain in labour and childbirth. A decision aid for managing the pain of childbirth is both practical and timely because there is a strong evidence base on labour analgesia but a lack of evidence-based information for women. For example, brochures on epidural analgesia outline the advantages of epidurals such as complete amelioration of pain, but do not present any information on adverse obstetric outcomes such as the doubling of risk for an instrumental birth. Most women are willing to experience pain in childbirth but do not want pain to overwhelm them. The decision aid will include a range of available drug and non-drug options for pain relief in labour and childbirth. Each of the options has benefits and risks, and the relative importance of these benefits and risks varies for individual women, a scenario where a decision aid produces the greatest benefit. The pain management decision aid developed in this project will be based on the best most recently available evidence and outcomes. It will incorporate a workbook, audiotape-CD and worksheet that will guide (but not direct) women with their pain management options that best suit them, taking ~30 minutes to complete. The decision aid will be evaluated to assess the impact on women's satisfaction with decision making, knowledge, anxiety and pregnancy outcomes. If successful, the results could be applied to improve consumer information and participation in clinical decisions across a wide spectrum of pregnancy care issues.Read moreRead less
Consumer Information Materials And A Communication Aid For Diagnostic Tests For Breast Disease
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$105,863.00
Summary
Many studies have now shown that the majority of patients want to participate in clinical decisions about medical treatments they might receive. As a result, information materials are being developed to help consumers and doctors work together to reach satisfying treatment decisions which are based on the best available evidence and also reflect the individual patient's needs and preferences about the treatment options. Very little is known, however, about whether consumers also want to particip ....Many studies have now shown that the majority of patients want to participate in clinical decisions about medical treatments they might receive. As a result, information materials are being developed to help consumers and doctors work together to reach satisfying treatment decisions which are based on the best available evidence and also reflect the individual patient's needs and preferences about the treatment options. Very little is known, however, about whether consumers also want to participate in decisions about whether to have a medical test. Tests can be trivial, such as a blood or urine test, or quite major and invasive, such as a biopsy or a colonoscopy. People considering a medical test might want to know the answers to the following questions: What is my chance of having the disease being tested for? If the test result is positive what is the chance I have the disease? If the test result is negative what is the chance I have the disease anyway? How will the test result influence treatment of my condition? What are possible side-effects of the test? Generally information materials about medical tests only describe the test itself, and do not contain the information people need to answer these questions. Even doctors may not have to hand the data needed to answer these questions. Yet without this information, consumers cannot make truly informed and rational choices about whether to have the test. This project aims to find out whether consumers want to participate in decisions about medical tests, what information they would want to do this, and to develop and trial information materials and a communication aid for a small number of breast cancer tests. We will use tests for diagnosing breast cancer as our model but we anticipate the work will be applicable across a wide range of medical tests.Read moreRead less
A Randomised Controlled Trial Of A Bowel Cancer Screening Decision Aid For Adults With Low Education And Literacy
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$237,277.00
Summary
The Commonwealth has committed funds for a national bowel cancer screening program. This will involve mailing bowel testing kits direct to eligible consumers at their homes. To minimise inequalities in accessing screening and to ensure effectiveness of the program, information and instructions for testing will have to be accessible to participants from low as well as high educational backgrounds. This project will evaluate communication strategies to achieve this. Reliance on written information ....The Commonwealth has committed funds for a national bowel cancer screening program. This will involve mailing bowel testing kits direct to eligible consumers at their homes. To minimise inequalities in accessing screening and to ensure effectiveness of the program, information and instructions for testing will have to be accessible to participants from low as well as high educational backgrounds. This project will evaluate communication strategies to achieve this. Reliance on written information has rapidly increased within healthcare. In particular, the use of patient decision aids to support and inform health decisions is rapidly increasing. The need to improve information in screening programs has been particularly highlighted and decision aids provide an evidence based approach to achieve this. However, whilst there is level 1 evidence that decision aids improve the decision making process for consumers, research has been carried out almost exclusively among educated participants with high literacy. There is concern that the needs of adults with low education and limited literacy have been ignored. The proposed study is 2 phased. Phase I will test optimal quantitative risk communication formats for adults with low education and literacy. Phase 2 will evaluate a tailored low literacy decision aid for FOBT screening. The trial will test whether the decision aid can increase knowledge of screening, increase involvement in decisions and improve the quality of decision making among adults with low education, and will examine its impact on screening intentions and behaviour. This is a highly significant study. Screening providers need better ways to inform consumers of screening programs that are accessible to a diverse audience and equitable across the target population. This study will have direct implications for use in the national bowel cancer screening program.Read moreRead less
Cancer Trials Australia-OnLine: A Tool For Cancer Patients To Find Open Clinical Trials And Consider Trial Participation
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$525,604.00
Summary
We will develop and evaluate a website for consumers which will interface with the ACTR to provide up to date information on currently recruiting cancer trials. Aims are: a) to increase awareness of cancer trials, and facilitate discussion between doctors and patients about participation in a clinical trial, and b) to support cancer consumers to make an informed decision about enrolling in a trial. A randomized trial will assess the effectiveness of the site in achieving these aims.
Preparing Cancer Patients For Clinical Decision Making: A Randomised Trial Of Preconsultation Preparation Packages.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$228,427.00
Summary
Most cancer patients in Australia now expect and are told their cancer diagnosis. There is considerable variation in the extent to which patients are informed about treatment options and are involved in treatment decisions. It can be argued that a treatment decision should be based on the oncologist's knowledge and the patient's preference. Two possible models can achieve this optimal outcome: the oncologist decides treatment on the basis of information passed on to him-her from the patient (the ....Most cancer patients in Australia now expect and are told their cancer diagnosis. There is considerable variation in the extent to which patients are informed about treatment options and are involved in treatment decisions. It can be argued that a treatment decision should be based on the oncologist's knowledge and the patient's preference. Two possible models can achieve this optimal outcome: the oncologist decides treatment on the basis of information passed on to him-her from the patient (the enabled doctor), and the patient chooses treatment based on informaton provided by the doctor (the empowered patient). We have developed a booklet on 'how treatment decisions are made'. In a randomised trial, patients seeing an oncologist for the first time are given the booklet and shown a video of ' their' oncologist interviewing an actor patient. The subsequent consultation is audiotaped to study the effect of these interventions on patient and doctor behaviour. The results of this trial will inform the development of our new patient educational materials. We now plan to develop consultation preparation packages. Patients will be sent information at least 48 hours before their first appointment with an oncologist with the goal of helping patients to achieve their preferred involvement in the consultation. The complete package will contain four components : a booklet on how treatment decisions are made including an outline of the two treatment decision models, a question prompt sheet and recommendation to prepare a list of questions, a booklet on Patient Rights, and an introduction to the Cancer Centre. The effects of the total package, and of just the Cancer Centre component on patient preferences for information and involvement in medical decisions, their consultation behaviour, and patient and doctor satisfaction with decision making will be studied in a randomised trial with control patients receiving no preparatory materials.Read moreRead less
Randomized Control Trial Of A Cancer Shared Care Model
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$242,400.00
Summary
Cancer care in Australia remains fragmented. Shared care has been seen as a potentially more effective way to manage patients with chronic and subacute diseases, by overcoming many of the difficulties which beset the traditional hospital-based model. These difficulties include poor communication between hospital-based and community-based carers, the high costs of hospital-based care and the loss of involvement of the primary care health professional in ongoing care. This project is a trial of a ....Cancer care in Australia remains fragmented. Shared care has been seen as a potentially more effective way to manage patients with chronic and subacute diseases, by overcoming many of the difficulties which beset the traditional hospital-based model. These difficulties include poor communication between hospital-based and community-based carers, the high costs of hospital-based care and the loss of involvement of the primary care health professional in ongoing care. This project is a trial of a Shared Care Model (SCM) with cancer patients in a hospital in Western Australia. The project is designed to improve the emotional well-being and feelings of empowerment of the patients as well as reduce the number of unplanned admissions these patients need to make during their cancer treatment. The SCM intervention includes: -A patient-held record (PHR) comprising chemotherapy road map, treatment intention, medication list and communication pages for health workers; - Earlier and timely direct communication between specialist and general practitioner; -A Shared Care coordinator to assist with patient care and information; and - General practitioner educational and resource packages with tailored side effects table detailing anticipated side effects and actions to be taken. - For rural patients, the model can be expanded to include general practitioner administration of selected chemotherapeutic agents on alternate cycles. - Protocols for general practitioners administration of selected chemotherapeutic agents.Read moreRead less
Nurses' Pain Management Decisions In The Post Surgery Context: A Naturalistic Study
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$56,368.00
Summary
In the hospital environment, doctors often prescribe medications for pain using an as required format on the drug order chart. Very often, this form of prescription occurs in the surgical wards of a hospital, where a patient may need a lot of pain relieving medication in the early period following the operation, and very little medication a few days following the operation. In the as required form of prescribing, the nurse caring for the patient has enormous flexibility in determining when and h ....In the hospital environment, doctors often prescribe medications for pain using an as required format on the drug order chart. Very often, this form of prescription occurs in the surgical wards of a hospital, where a patient may need a lot of pain relieving medication in the early period following the operation, and very little medication a few days following the operation. In the as required form of prescribing, the nurse caring for the patient has enormous flexibility in determining when and how much medication should be administered. Previous work has consistently shown that nurses do not administer adequate medication, which often results in poor pain control. Several nurse-related reasons have been proposed for poor pain management, including the fear of addiction, the fear of producing difficulties in breathing, and inadequate education about the medications administered. The focus of previous work has relied on examining small areas in isolation. Primarily, researchers have examined information on the drug order charts following patient discharge from hospital. They have also relied on analysing nurses' views on pain management relating to hypothetical patient situations. Overall, the research fails to address the multiple and interconnected factors faced by the nurse which could impact on pain management. Sources of these factors may be the patient, nurse, medication or environment. Examples of these factors include the presence or absence of the doctor, nurses' communication with doctors and other nurses about patient care, layout of the hospital ward, ward management structure, and methods used by the nurse to assess patient pain. By identifying the complex factors that impinge on decisions for managing pain, this study will provide opportunities to address the barriers that prevent adequate pain management. Nurses will then be in a position to change their practice in order to improve the management of patients' pain.Read moreRead less
An Ethical Analysis Of The Disclosure Of Surgeons' Performance Data To Patients Within The Informed Consent Process
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$148,937.00
Summary
For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information co ....For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information contained in report cards when deciding whether or not to consent to have a particular surgeon conduct an operation on them. Contemporary bioethicists stress the importance of a proper informed consent process in medicine. This is a process in which a doctor advises a patient of relevant information and ensures that the patient comprehends that information, before the patient consents to an operation. Currently report cards in America are publicly disseminated on the internet, however there is no systematic attempt to incorporate the information contained in report cards into the informed consent process. We do not know if patients understand the information they are given, or if they incorporate it into their decision making procedures appropriately. In our study we will consider how information that is contained in report cards could best be used in the informed consent process. We will keep in mind the importance of helping patients to make their own informed decisions to consent to operations, the importance of respecting the professional integrity of surgeons and the importance of providing the best possible standard of care for patients. The result of our study will be a revised model of the informed consent process that incorporates report cards in an ethically acceptable way.Read moreRead less
Adolescent Population Health: Application Of Best-Worst Scaling Discrete Choice Experiments To Value Health States For Use In Economic Evaluation
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$178,779.00
Summary
Historically, economic evaluations of health care treatment and preventive programs developed for adolescents have failed to incorporate adolescent values about their preferred health outcomes. This project will apply a novel approach known as Best-Worst Scaling to ascertain adolescent specific values for health states for incorporation into economic evaluation, thereby enabling the views of adolescents to be incorporated directly into the health care priorities decision-making process.