Understanding reactions to diversity initiatives in organizations: An intergroup perspective. Current policy and legislation promote diversity in organizations,
however employees often react negatively to diversity initiatives
that assist specific groups (e.g., women). Explanations attributing
negativity to individual factors (e.g., self interest) or to broad
organizational culture are limited. Diversity initiatives highlight
differences between the beneficiary and non-beneficiary group(s) ....Understanding reactions to diversity initiatives in organizations: An intergroup perspective. Current policy and legislation promote diversity in organizations,
however employees often react negatively to diversity initiatives
that assist specific groups (e.g., women). Explanations attributing
negativity to individual factors (e.g., self interest) or to broad
organizational culture are limited. Diversity initiatives highlight
differences between the beneficiary and non-beneficiary group(s) and
a comprehensive model should incorporate an intergroup perspective.
It should also recognise the legitimising role of justice-based
concerns. In testing such a model, this project will contribute to
theories of intergroup relations and their interplay with social
policy, and to the development of strategies to manage workplace
diversity.
Read moreRead less
Responding to self-conceptual uncertainty: Orthodoxy, diversity, and social identity in groups and society. Some groups in society are ethnocentric and xenophobic, embracing orthodoxy, homogeneity and hierarchy. They suppress diversity and dissent. Other groups embrace diversity, and are wary of homogeneity and hierarchy. Project explores the social psychology of identity and group membership, to answer the question why some groups are orthodox whereas others are diverse. Uncertainty about one's ....Responding to self-conceptual uncertainty: Orthodoxy, diversity, and social identity in groups and society. Some groups in society are ethnocentric and xenophobic, embracing orthodoxy, homogeneity and hierarchy. They suppress diversity and dissent. Other groups embrace diversity, and are wary of homogeneity and hierarchy. Project explores the social psychology of identity and group membership, to answer the question why some groups are orthodox whereas others are diverse. Uncertainty about one's group identity is aversive; automatically motivating identification with groups that are distinct entities with sharp boundaries, consensual properties, and homogeneous membership. However, internally diverse groups can also be distinct (often better functioning) entities. Buffering of automatic reactions to uncertainty may favour diverse over orthodox groups.Read moreRead less