As Director of Research in the Department of Cardiology, Prof Hare supervises a number of research groups, a major one being a “Psychosocial” research group, others including a “wet “ vascular laboratory, a clinical cardio-vascular laboratory, an exercise research group and a clinical trials group primarily working in heart failure.
Measuring Adverse Events: Development Of A Patient-Centred Adverse Event Reporting Tool (PAET)
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$454,721.00
Summary
The decision to treat a patient depends on knowing whether the treatment does more good than harm. If it is likely that the treatment will work as well as or better than other treatments and will have minimal associated risks, then that treatment would be recommended unless unavailable or prohibited by cost. Given two equally effective treatments the one with fewer side effects and greater tolerability would be preferred by all. In the process of acquiring knowledge on treatment benefit and trea ....The decision to treat a patient depends on knowing whether the treatment does more good than harm. If it is likely that the treatment will work as well as or better than other treatments and will have minimal associated risks, then that treatment would be recommended unless unavailable or prohibited by cost. Given two equally effective treatments the one with fewer side effects and greater tolerability would be preferred by all. In the process of acquiring knowledge on treatment benefit and treatment harm we rely on evidence from clinical trials. However, the evaluation of benefit versus harm is not symmetric in this setting. Much more effort (e.g. study design, study power, standardisation of efficacy outcome measures) goes into the assessment of whether a treatment works and rather than its potential harm, as measured by adverse events. Adverse event ascertainment and reporting is poorly standardised . There is no standardised measurement process that elicits adverse event information. There is no standardised method for quantifying adverse event information into an index or profile scores equivalent to instruments developed to measure health status, quality of life and other benefits of treatment. Developing astandardised Patient-centred Adverse Event Questionnaire will benefit multiple stakeholders. For Patients: An easy to understand summary measure of treatment harm aids patient understanding of the benefit versus risk. For Doctors, allied health professionals: The Questionnaire includes drug profiles, to align a drug profile with an individual patient's clinical profile. This leads to better patient care. In health policy: All of the above has flow-on effects for policy. Better adverse event data will facilitate information and understanding generally of risks of treatments, risk-benefits of treatments, and cost-effectiveness of management strategies.Read moreRead less
Improving Quality Of Life In High-risk Cancer Populations: A Randomised Trial Of A Structured Intervention For Head And Neck Cancer Survivors
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$493,220.00
Summary
Patients treated for head and neck cancer commonly experience pain, disfigurement, eating difficulties, depression and fatigue, undermining confidence and quality of life. This study aims to help patients self-manage their ongoing health problems following completion of treatment. This will be achieved through a randomised trial in which patients will be assisted by a trained oncology nurse to develop a tailored survivorship care plan focusing on the patient’s specific medical and emotional conc ....Patients treated for head and neck cancer commonly experience pain, disfigurement, eating difficulties, depression and fatigue, undermining confidence and quality of life. This study aims to help patients self-manage their ongoing health problems following completion of treatment. This will be achieved through a randomised trial in which patients will be assisted by a trained oncology nurse to develop a tailored survivorship care plan focusing on the patient’s specific medical and emotional concerns.Read moreRead less
A Comprehensive Self-Management Programme For Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease In The Community
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$391,610.00
Summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of burden of disease in Australia. It has a major impact on sufferers, their carers and society. This study introduces a new model of community care, based on case management, mentoring to improve self-efficacy and information systems to deliver information and closely monitor disease status. This will improve the quality of life of sufferers, develop healthcare networks and decrease healthcare utilisation.
Integration Of Exercise Counselling And Support Into The Musculoskeletal Help Line For People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Mixed-methods Evaluation Of A Novel Telephone Service.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$437,099.00
Summary
Exercise is an important part of self-management for people with knee osteoarthritis, however access to qualified clinicians is limited for many Australians with knee osteoarthritis. In addition, most exercise providers are not adequately trained to motivate and support people to effectively incorporate exercise into their life on a long-term basis. This project will implement and evaluate a telephone-based exercise counselling and support service for people with knee osteoarthritis.